• SANBI Metadata
  •  
  •  
  •  

Archived KZNSCP: Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan

Terrestrial Critical biodiversity areas in KZN developed 2010. This is an update to the 2007 terrestrial C-Plan.

Simple

Date (Publication)
2010
Edition

1.0

Purpose

To ensure wise use of the provinces natural resources

Status
On going
Custodian
  KZN Wildlife - Dr B J Escott ( GIS Analyst (Terrestrial) )
Peter Brown Dr, Town Bush Valley , Pietermaritzburg, , 3202 , South Africa
033 845 1999
Maintenance and update frequency
As needed
Theme
  • Terrestrial Critical Biodiversity Areas

Place
  • KwaZulu-Natal

  • South Africa

Access constraints
Copyright
Use constraints
otherRestictions
Spatial representation type
Vector
Denominator
50000
Language
English
Character set
UTF8
Topic category
  • Environment
Begin date
2016-01-01
N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Reference system identifier
WGS 1984

Distributor

Distributor
  SANBI
Name

ZIP

Version

1

OnLine resource
A list of services published are available at this URL. ( WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link )

BGIS Map Services

OnLine resource
A list of spatial data-sets are available at this URL. ( WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related )

BGIS Spatial Datasets

Hierarchy level
Dataset
Statement

Critical Biodiversity Area 1 Mandatory (Value in legend field in the attribute table = R2) The CBA1 designated planning units contain one or more features within an irreplaceability =2. This means that there are no other localities which we have been able to identify as alternates to try an meet the conservation target for this feature(s). The distribution of this/these features is not always applicable to the entire extent of the PU however (except in the case of certain grassland vegetation types), but is more often than not confined to a specific niche habitat e.g. a forest or wetland. Should this be the case, and special mitigation measures would have to be considered to safeguard this feature are put in place, then the potential for development (dependant on its nature of course) could be permitted in the area.


Obviously this is dependent on a site by site, case by case basis. This distribution dynamics outlined above are the same for all 3 CBA's indicated in the MINSET.


Critical Biodiversity Area 2 Mandatory (Value in legend field in the attribute table = R1) CBA2 indicate the presence of one (or more) features with a very high irreplaceability score. In practical terms, this means that there are alternate sites within which the targets can be met, but there aren't many. This site was chosen because it represents the most optimal area for choice in the systematic

planning process, meeting both the target goals for the features concerned, as well as a number of other guiding criteria such as high agricultural potential area avoidance, falls within a macro-ecological corridor etc. Whilst the targets could be met elsewhere, the revised reserve design (derived through MINSET) would more often than not be slightly more 'land-hungry' in an effort to meet its conservation objectives.


The scarcity of the Biodiversity features contained within is, however, still the primary driver for this PU's selection in MINSET. Critical Biodiversity Area 3 Optimal (Value in legend field in the attribute table = R0) CBA3 indicate the presence of one (or more) features with a low irreplaceability score. Derived in the same way as outlined for CBA2 described above, the determination vision of these PU's is driven primarily by the guiding layers. The areas not highlighted in MINSET ARE NOT OPEN for wholesale development. Important species are still located within them and should be accounted for in the EIA process. They are not highlighted as the MINSET highlights the 'choice' areas from a biodiversity point of view only. Should one or more of the CBA2 and CBA3 sites be utilised for development, it is obvious that the target for whatever feature(s) where located within that PU will not longer be met. Ideally, MINSET would have to be re-run to calculate the next optimal solution, the new PUs being 'extracted' from the currently blank/un-defined areas.


Biodiversity Area (Value in legend field in the attribute table = 0CO) The areas not highlighted in MINSET ARE NOT OPEN for wholesale development. Important species are still located within them and should be accounted for in the EIA process. They are not highlighted as the MINSET highlights the 'choice' areas from a biodiversity point of view only. Should one or more of the CBA2 and CBA3 sites be utilised for development, it is obvious that the target for whatever feature(s) where located within that PU will not longer be met. Ideally, MINSET would have to be re-run to calculate the next optimal solution, the new PUs being 'extracted' from the currently blank/un-defined areas.


Recommended Citation


EKZNW (2010) Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan: Minimum Selection Surface (MINSET).

Unpublished GIS Coverage [tscp_minset_dist_2010_wll.zip], Biodiversity Conservation Planning Division,

Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, P. O. Box 13053, Cascades, Pietermaritzburg, 3202.

File identifier
833c69fc-2cb0-419d-9e17-82e9fbad725a XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
UTF8
Date stamp
2017-06-29T12:12:22
Metadata standard name

SANS 1878

Metadata standard version

FGDC-STD-001-1998

Distributor
  SANBI - Sediqa Khatieb ( The Metadata Manager )
Kirstenbosch Research Centre , Cape Town , Claremont , 7735 , South Africa
+27 21 799 8738
 
 

Overviews

Spatial extent

N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Keywords

Terrestrial Critical Biodiversity Areas

Provided by

logo

Share on social sites

Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •