• SANBI Metadata
  •  
  •  
  •  

FSP: Aquatic Critical Ecological Support Areas (Hantam Municipality) 2008

These data represent aquatic sites identified as Critical Ecological Support Areas (CESAs) through the systematic assessment conducted by the C.A.P.E. FineScale Biodiversity Planning (FSP) project. CESAs include both the aquatic feature as well as the required buffer area surrounding the aquatic feature. One of two files: CESA polygons and polylines. Critical Ecological Support Areas are zones required for preventing degradation of Critical Biodiversity Areas*, and thus require moderate to high levels of protection and/or management. Various moderate impact land management options exist, but ecological structure and functioning must be preserved. Critical Biodiversity Areas (terrestrial and aquatic) represent the sites required to meet biodiversity pattern targets and ecological process objectives. The loss of a single site would compromise the meeting of targets and objectives. For more information about how CBAs (Critical Biodiversity Areas), CESAs (Critical Ecological Support Areas), and OESAs (Other Ecological Support Areas) were selected see:


• Pence, Genevieve Q.K. 2008 (in prep). C.A.P.E. Fine-Scale Systematic Conservation Planning Assessment: Technical Report. Produced for CapeNature. Cape Town, South Africa.


• For more information about the freshwater component of FSP see:


• Job, N., Snaddon, K., Day, L., Nel, J. and Smith-Adoa, L. 2008 (in prep). C.A.P.E. Fine-scale Biodiversity Planning Project: Freshwater Ecosystems of the North-west Sandveld and Saldanha Peninsula planning domain. Produced for CapeNature. Cape Town, South Africa.

Simple

Date (Publication)
2008
Edition

1.0

Purpose

Biodiversity feature information for use in the C.A.P.E. Fine-Scale Biodiversity Plans. These plans are to serve as the primary spatial biodiversity informant guiding proactive conservation action and directing land-use planning and reactive decision-making in local, provincial and national spheres of government.


This is one of a core set of FSP biodiversity informants (GIS files) for this region (West Coast:

Saldanha Peninsula and Northwest Sandveld):


• cba_terrestrial_ht_geo

• cba_aquatic_ ht_geo

• cesa_aquatic_ ht_geo

• cesa_aquatic_polyline_ ht_geo

• oesa_aquatic_ ht_geo

• oesa_aquatic_polyline_ ht_geo


These should be used in conjunction with Protected Area information (note that CBAs fall exclusively outside of protected areas) and FSP “Other Natural Areas” and “No Natural Remaining”.

Status
On going
Custodian
  CapeNature - Kerry te Roller (CapeNature) Sediqa Khatieb (SANBI BGIS) Helen de Klerk (CapeNature) ( The GIS Officer )
Kirstenbosch Research Center, Rhodes Drive, Newlands, , Cape Town , 7700 , South Africa
021 799 8731, 021 799 8738, 021 866 8000
Maintenance and update frequency
As needed
Theme
  • Ecological Support Areas

  • Aquatic

Place
  • Hantam

  • South Africa

  • Western Cape

Access constraints
Copyright
Use constraints
otherRestictions
Other constraints

Copyright holder: Yes copyright exists with the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (WCNCB). Where the data is used as basis for or as an insertion in a project, acknowledgement must be made of the source of the (CapeNature, C.A.P.E. Fine-Scale Biodiversity Planning Project) as well as the copyright of CapeNature

Spatial representation type
Vector
Denominator
50000
Language
English
Character set
UTF8
Topic category
  • Environment
Begin date
2016-01-01
N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Reference system identifier
WGS 1984

Distributor

Distributor
  SANBI
Name

ZIP

Version

1

OnLine resource
A list of spatial data-sets are available at this URL. ( WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related )

BGIS Spatial Datasets

Hierarchy level
Dataset
Statement

Methodology:


This layer is a combination of the following GIS datasets (from which Critical Biodiversity Areas, Critical Ecological Support Areas, and Other Ecological Support Areas were extracted and merged into separate layers):


1. all_wetlands_final.shp (C.A.P.E. FSP* manually digitised off imagery and partially groundtruthed),

2. estuaries.shp (C.A.P.E. FSP* manually digitised off imagery and partially ground-truthed), and

3. rivsq4_ss_final.shp (C.A.P.E. FSP* attributed selection from 1:500K river line data).


*FSP contracted the Freshwater Consulting Group and CSIR to deliver these input products. Further documentation for the original datasets is available.


The following sets of Chief Directorate Surveys and Mapping (CDSM) 2006 1:50,000 topographic vector data were used to refine the scale of the attributed river network from 1:500,000 to 1:50,000 and to define the extent of open water within wetland and estuarine areas.


1. inland_water.shp (excluding man-made features),

2. river_area.shp (to define river bed, not banks), and

3. river_line.shp (buffered to define river bed).


The CATEGORY distinction was made in the rivsq4_ss_final.shp dataset between CBAs/CESAs/OESAs (Critical Biodiversity Areas / Critical Ecological Support Areas / Other Ecological Support Areas) and transferred/attributed to the appropriate segment in the

inland_water.shp, river_area.shp, and river_line.shp. The relevant buffer distance used to create polygons from polygons and polylines (GEOCLASS column) was also established in rivsq4_ss.shp layer. Buffer layers (separate) do not overlap their

parent polygons/polylines. The method for selecting Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs), Critical Ecological Support Areas (CESAs), and Other Ecological Support Areas (OESAs) from the full set of wetland, river, and estuarine features was based on a systematic conservation planning approach whereby targets (quantitative objectives) were established for a representative suite of biodiversity features, and the decision-support software Marxan was used (via CLUZ interface software) to generate the best spatial solutions (i.e., most efficient selection of planning units required) for meeting conservation targets. For further detailed information about the methodology see the FSP Technical Reports.


Available documentation:


Pence, Genevieve Q.K. 2008 (in prep). C.A.P.E. Fine-Scale Systematic Conservation Planning Assessment: Technical Report. Produced for CapeNature. Cape Town, South Africa.


Job, N., Snaddon, K., Day, L., Nel, J. and Smith-Adoa, L. 2008 (in prep). C.A.P.E. Fine-scale Biodiversity Planning Project: Freshwater Ecosystems of the North-west Sandveld and Saldanha Peninsula planning domain. Produced for CapeNature. Cape Town, South Africa.


Project Name:

Fine-Scale Biodiversity Planning project, as part of Component 5.1 of Cape Action Plan for People and the Environment (C.A.P.E.)


Creator Organisation:


Genevieve Q.K. Pence, Conservation Planner

Consultant

File identifier
0f49c96b-2b1b-4011-b213-e7360cfdfec1 XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
UTF8
Date stamp
2017-09-13T11:33:50
Metadata standard name

SANS 1878

Metadata standard version

FGDC-STD-001-1998

Distributor
  SANBI - ( The Metadata Manager )
Kirstenbosch Research Centre , Cape Town , Claremont , 7735 , South Africa
+27 21 799 8738
 
 

Overviews

Spatial extent

N
S
E
W
thumbnail


Keywords

Aquatic Ecological Support Areas

Provided by

logo

Share on social sites

Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •